CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Monalisa Baruah Mehta

Indian table tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ6897939 ↗
Source-derived summary

Monalisa Mehta (née Baruah) is an Indian table tennis player from Assam. She received an Arjuna Award in 1987.

She is married to Kamlesh Mehta, eight-time national table tennis champion.

She has an apartment in Shine Heaven, Panjabari, Guwahati.

She is employed in Oil India Limited.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Monalisa Baruah Mehta” is indian table tennis player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Monalisa, Baruah and Mehta, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1987—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Monalisa, Baruah and Mehta is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “indian table tennis player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6897939. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1987.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Monalisa Baruah Mehta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Monalisa Baruah Mehta primary sources, Monalisa Baruah Mehta archive and Monalisa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monalisa Baruah Mehta”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Monalisa Baruah Mehta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.