CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mona de Momma

American-bred Thoroughbred racehorse

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2019
Entity authorityQ6897740 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mona de Momma (foaled March 16, 2006) is an American Thoroughbred racehorse.

She is a Speightstown filly out of the Linkage mare Society Gal, a half sister to Grade 3 winner and sire Mr. Greenly. Owned by Michael Talla and trained by John W. Sadler, in 2010 burst onto the spotlight when she won the Las Flores Handicap, then she defeated 2009 Eclipse Champion Sprint Mare Informed Decision in the Humana Distaff Stakes on the Kentucky Derby undercard.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mona de Momma” as american-bred Thoroughbred racehorse. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Mona, Momma and American-bred.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2010, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2006. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Mona, Momma and American-bred providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mona de Momma”, the useful work is to connect “american-bred Thoroughbred racehorse” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2019. The linked authority identifier is Q6897740. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2010 and 2009.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mona de Momma”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mona de Momma primary sources, Mona de Momma archive and Mona research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mona de Momma”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mona de Momma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.