Isotopes of molybdenum
Open-knowledge reference entry
Molybdenum (42Mo) has seven isotopes in nature, with atomic masses of 92, 94-98, and 100. All are stable except 100Mo, which undergoes double beta decay with a half-life of 7.07×1018 years (the shortest known for this mode) to 100Ru. 92Mo and 98Mo are also energetically able to decay in this manner, to zirconium and ruthenium respectively; the others are theoretically stable. There are also a total of 32 synthetic isotopes known, and at least 13 metastable nuclear isomers, ranging in atomic mass from 81 to 119.
The isotopes with mass 93 or lower decay by electron capture or positron emission to niobium isotopes (or zirconium after delayed proton emission); those with mass 99 or higher by ordinary beta decay to technetium. The most stable of the former are 93Mo, recently measured to have a half-life around 4800 years, and 90Mo at 5.56 hours. The most stable of the latter is the medically important 99Mo, half-life 65.932 hours, and whose decay leads to the chief isotope of technetium. By far the most stable isomer is 93m1Mo at 6.85 hours, decaying to its ground state.
List of isotopes
Molybdenum-99
Molybdenum-99 is produced commercially by intense neutron-bombardment (i.e. fission) of a highly purified uranium-235 target, followed rapidly by extraction.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Isotopes of molybdenum” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Isotopes, molybdenum and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q469900. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1018.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of molybdenum”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Isotopes of molybdenum primary sources, Isotopes of molybdenum archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of molybdenum”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Isotopes of molybdenum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.