CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Mohammed Bakrim

Moroccan film critic

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ109682514 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mohammed Bakrim is a Moroccan film critic. He was President of the Aflam Association of Film Critics and Journalists (Morocco) and vice president of the African Federation of Film Critics (FACC). Bakrim was also the spokesperson of Morocco's national film center (CCM). Author of numerous analysis and film reviews, he is a regulator contributor to newspaper Libération and magazine Cinémag.

Publications

2007: Le Désir permanent.

Editorial summary

“Mohammed Bakrim” enters the record as moroccan film critic. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mohammed, Bakrim and Moroccan can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Mohammed, Bakrim and Moroccan.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Mohammed Bakrim” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mohammed, Bakrim and Moroccan provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q109682514. VIAF identifies the subject as 2531167625758003660003. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mohammed Bakrim”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mohammed Bakrim primary sources, Mohammed Bakrim archive and Mohammed research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mohammed Bakrim”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mohammed Bakrim” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.