Absolute value
nonnegative number with the same magnitude as a given real number

In mathematics, the absolute value or modulus of a real number
x
{\displaystyle x}
, denoted
|
x
|
{\displaystyle |x|}
, is the (non-negative) magnitude of
x
{\displaystyle x}
measured without regard to its sign. Namely,
|
x
|
=
x
{\displaystyle |x|=x}
if
x
{\displaystyle x}
is a positive number, and
|
x
|
=
−
x
{\displaystyle |x|=-x}
if
x
{\displaystyle x}
is negative (in which case
−
x
{\displaystyle -x}
is positive), and
|
0
|
=
0
{\displaystyle |0|=0}
. For example, the absolute value of 3 is 3, and the absolute value of −3 is also 3. The absolute value of a number may be thought of as its distance from zero.
Generalisations of the absolute value for real numbers occur in a wide variety of mathematical settings. For example, an absolute value is also defined for the complex numbers, the quaternions, ordered rings, fields and vector spaces. The absolute value is closely related to the notions of magnitude, distance, and norm in various mathematical and physical contexts.
Terminology and notation
In 1806, Jean-Robert Argand introduced the term module, meaning unit of measure in French, specifically for the complex absolute value, and it was borrowed into English in 1866 as the Latin equivalent modulus. The term absolute value has been used in this sense from at least 1806 in French and 1857 in English. The notation |x|, with a vertical bar on each side, was introduced by Karl Weierstrass in 1841.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Absolute value” as nonnegative number with the same magnitude as a given real number. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as nonnegative number with the same magnitude as a given real number. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120812. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1806, 1866, 1857 and 1841.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Absolute value”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Absolute value primary sources, Absolute value archive and Absolute research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Absolute value”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Absolute value” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.