CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mixed Poisson process

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2021
Entity authorityQ55648392
Source-derived summary

In probability theory, a mixed Poisson process is a special point process that is a generalization of a Poisson process. Mixed Poisson processes are simple example for Cox processes.

Definition

Let

μ

{\displaystyle \mu }

be a locally finite measure on

S

{\displaystyle S}

and let

X

{\displaystyle X}

be a random variable with

X

0

{\displaystyle X\geq 0}

almost surely.

Then a random measure

ξ

{\displaystyle \xi }

on

S

{\displaystyle S}

is called a mixed Poisson process based on

μ

{\displaystyle \mu }

and

X

{\displaystyle X}

iff

ξ

{\displaystyle \xi }

conditionally on

X

=

x

{\displaystyle X=x}

is a Poisson process on

S

{\displaystyle S}

with intensity measure

x

μ

{\displaystyle x\mu }

.

Comment

Mixed Poisson processes are doubly stochastic in the sense that in a first step, the value of the random variable

X

{\displaystyle X}

is determined. This value then determines the "second order stochasticity" by increasing or decreasing the original intensity measure

μ

{\displaystyle \mu }

.

Properties

Conditional on

X

=

x

{\displaystyle X=x}

mixed Poisson processes have the intensity measure

x

μ

{\displaystyle x\mu }

and the Laplace transform

L

(

f

)

=

exp

(

1

exp

(

f

(

y

)

)

(

x

μ

)

(

d

y

)

)

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}(f)=\exp \left(-\int 1-\exp(-f(y))\;(x\mu )(\mathrm {d} y)\right)}

.

Sources

Kallenberg, Olav (2017). Random Measures, Theory and Applications. Switzerland: Springer.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Mixed Poisson process” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Mixed, Poisson and process, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Mixed, Poisson and process is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q55648392. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mixed Poisson process”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mixed Poisson process primary sources, Mixed Poisson process archive and Mixed research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mixed Poisson process”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mixed Poisson process” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.