Mixed Poisson process
Open-knowledge reference entry

In probability theory, a mixed Poisson process is a special point process that is a generalization of a Poisson process. Mixed Poisson processes are simple example for Cox processes.
Definition
Let
μ
{\displaystyle \mu }
be a locally finite measure on
S
{\displaystyle S}
and let
X
{\displaystyle X}
be a random variable with
X
≥
0
{\displaystyle X\geq 0}
almost surely.
Then a random measure
ξ
{\displaystyle \xi }
on
S
{\displaystyle S}
is called a mixed Poisson process based on
μ
{\displaystyle \mu }
and
X
{\displaystyle X}
iff
ξ
{\displaystyle \xi }
conditionally on
X
=
x
{\displaystyle X=x}
is a Poisson process on
S
{\displaystyle S}
with intensity measure
x
μ
{\displaystyle x\mu }
.
Comment
Mixed Poisson processes are doubly stochastic in the sense that in a first step, the value of the random variable
X
{\displaystyle X}
is determined. This value then determines the "second order stochasticity" by increasing or decreasing the original intensity measure
μ
{\displaystyle \mu }
.
Properties
Conditional on
X
=
x
{\displaystyle X=x}
mixed Poisson processes have the intensity measure
x
μ
{\displaystyle x\mu }
and the Laplace transform
L
(
f
)
=
exp
(
−
∫
1
−
exp
(
−
f
(
y
)
)
(
x
μ
)
(
d
y
)
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}(f)=\exp \left(-\int 1-\exp(-f(y))\;(x\mu )(\mathrm {d} y)\right)}
.
Sources
Kallenberg, Olav (2017). Random Measures, Theory and Applications. Switzerland: Springer.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Mixed Poisson process” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Mixed, Poisson and process, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q55648392. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Mixed Poisson process”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Mixed Poisson process primary sources, Mixed Poisson process archive and Mixed research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mixed Poisson process”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Mixed Poisson process” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.