Mitsubishi 2MB2
prototype bomber aircraft
The Mitsubishi 2MB2 or Experimental Washi-type Light Bomber was a prototype Japanese single-engined biplane light bomber of the 1920s. A single example was built for the Imperial Japanese Army, but no production followed.
Design and development
In 1925, the Imperial Japanese Army issued a specification for a single-engined bomber, requesting responses from Mitsubishi, Nakajima and Kawasaki. To design an aircraft to meet this requirement, Mitsubishi hired the German designer Alexander Baumann, a professor at Stuttgart University, and former designer of Riesenflugzeug for Zeppelin-Staaken to supervise the design team, with Nobushiro Nakata as chief designer.
The team led by Baumann and Nakata designed a sesquiplane (i.e. a biplane with the lower wing much smaller than the upper) of mixed wood and metal construction. The high-aspect ratio wings were braced by struts arranged in a "W" shape forming a Warren truss, while the fuselage had a metal structure covered in fabric, carrying the crew of two who sat in open cockpits. The aircraft was powered by a single Mitsubishi Hi V-12 (Hispano-Suiza Lb) V12 engine driving a two-bladed fixed pitch metal propeller and had a fixed conventional landing gear. The aircraft carried up to 800 kg (1,800 lb) of bombs, with the pilot aiming two fixed forward firing machine guns, and the observer operating two flexibly mounted machine guns, one in a dorsal position and one in a ventral mount.
The prototype bomber, known as the 2MB2, or Experimental Washi-type Light Bomber (Washi - Eagle), was completed in December 1925.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Mitsubishi 2MB2” as prototype bomber aircraft. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as prototype bomber aircraft. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q94210. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1925.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Mitsubishi 2MB2”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Mitsubishi 2MB2 primary sources, Mitsubishi 2MB2 archive and Mitsubishi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mitsubishi 2MB2”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Mitsubishi 2MB2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.