CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Mistress Moon

1941 film by Theo Lingen

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ18698460
Source-derived summary

Mistress Moon (German: Frau Luna) is a 1941 German musical comedy film directed by Theo Lingen and starring Lizzi Waldmüller, Fita Benkhoff and Irene von Meyendorff. An operetta film, it is based on the stage work Frau Luna composed by Paul Lincke. It was shot at the Halensee Studios in Berlin. The film's sets were designed by the art directors Heinrich Beisenherz and Alfred Bütow.

Cast

Lizzi Waldmüller as Operettensängerin Vera Waldner

Fita Benkhoff as Frau Elisabeth Gerlack

Irene von Meyendorff as Gerda

Theo Lingen as Lepke

Paul Kemp as Max

Georg Alexander as Präsident Felix Lüdecke

Paul Henckels as Geheimrat Schmidt

Will Dohm as Direktor Knoppe

Karl Schönböck as Paul Rüdinger

Hubert von Meyerinck as Rat Haschke

Paul Westermeier as Mechaniker Scholte

Kurt Seifert as Paul Lindemann

Jakob Tiedtke as Schlüssler

Else von Möllendorff as Traute

Ursula Herking as Cäcilie

Günther Lüders as Friese

Leo Peukert as Gastwirt

Karl Platen as Regisseur am Apollo-Theater

Klaus Pohl as Mann im Apollo-Theater

Fred Goebel as Polizeibeamter

Hans Hermann Schaufuß as Polizeirat aus Cottbus

Angelo Ferrari as Polizeirat aus Cottbus

Gerhard Dammann as Kutscher

Olga Engl as schwerhörige Kundin

Cordy Millowitsch as Frau Busebach

References

Bibliography

Bock, Hans-Michael & Bergfelder, Tim. The Concise CineGraph. Encyclopedia of German Cinema. Berghahn Books, 2009.

Editorial summary

“Mistress Moon” enters the record as 1941 film by Theo Lingen. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mistress, Moon and film can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1941, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1941. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Mistress, Moon and film.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Mistress Moon” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mistress, Moon and film provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18698460. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1941 and 2009.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mistress Moon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mistress Moon primary sources, Mistress Moon archive and Mistress research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mistress Moon”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mistress Moon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.