CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave

1855 murder trial in the United States

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ28405006 ↗
Source-derived summary

State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave was an 1855 murder trial held in the Circuit Court of Callaway County, Missouri, in which an enslaved woman named Celia was tried for the first-degree murder of her enslaver, Robert Newsom. Celia was convicted by a jury of twelve white men and sentenced to death. An appeal of the conviction was denied by the Supreme Court of Missouri in December 1855, and Celia was hanged on December 21, 1855.

At the request of her descendants, Celia was posthumously pardoned by Governor Mike Parson on December 20, 2024.

Background

Sometime around 1819, Robert Newsom left his home state of Virginia and traveled west and eventually settled in Callaway County, Missouri, with his wife and children. By 1850, Newsom considered himself a prosperous man in his new home, where he owned eight hundred acres of land and enslaved five men. Newsom's wife died sometime in 1849, and, less than a year later in 1850, Newsom travelled to Audrain County to purchase Celia, the first girl to be enslaved on his plantation. It is likely that Newsom raped the 14-year-old Celia for the first time on the journey from Audrain County back to Callaway County.

Back on Newsom's property in Callaway County, Celia lived only about fifty feet away from the main house and separately from the enslaved men.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave” as 1855 murder trial in the United States. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around State, Missouri and Celia.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1855, 2024, 1819, 1850—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with State, Missouri and Celia providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave”, the useful work is to connect “1855 murder trial in the United States” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28405006. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1855, 2024, 1819 and 1850.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave primary sources, State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave archive and State research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “State of Missouri v. Celia, a Slave” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.