CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Misbahul Islam Laskar

Indian politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ107410218 ↗
Source-derived summary

Misbahul Islam Laskar is an Indian politician from Assam. He was elected to the Assam Legislative Assembly from Barkhola in the 2021 Assam Legislative Assembly election as a member of the Indian National Congress. He previously served as an MLA of the Assam Legislative Assembly from 1996 to 2006. He served as the Minister of Cooperation and Tourism from 2001 to 2006 in Tarun Gogoi's first cabinet. He also served as the chairman of Assam Minority Development Board.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Misbahul Islam Laskar” as indian politician. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Misbahul, Islam and Laskar.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 1996, 2006, 2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Misbahul, Islam and Laskar providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Misbahul Islam Laskar”, the useful work is to connect “indian politician” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q107410218. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021, 1996, 2006 and 2001.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Misbahul Islam Laskar”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Misbahul Islam Laskar primary sources, Misbahul Islam Laskar archive and Misbahul research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Misbahul Islam Laskar”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Misbahul Islam Laskar” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.