CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Jacques de Hemricourt

French historian (1333-1403)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 27, 2024
Entity authorityQ1678133 ↗
Source-derived summary

Jacques de Hemricourt (1333–1403) was a 14th-century mayor of Liège and chronicler of the nobility of Hesbaye.

Life

Hemricourt, the son of Gilles de Hemricourt and Ida d'Abbé, in 1360 succeeded his father as clerk to the aldermen of Liège. He continued in office until 1383. In 1381 Arnold of Horne, Prince-Bishop of Liège, appointed him to his privy council, and in 1389 he was elected mayor of Liège. In 1397, after being widowed for the second time, he became a knight of St John of Jerusalem.

He died in Liège on 18 December 1403.

Writings

Hemricourt was the author of the heraldic and genealogical chronicle Miroir des nobles de Hesbaye ("Mirror of the Nobles of Hesbaye"), running to the year 1398, as well as an account of the 38-year feud (1297—1335) between the lineages of Awans and Waroux, Le Traité des Guerres d'Awans et de Waroux, and a treatise on the political institutions of the Prince-Bishopric of Liège, Le Patron de la Temporalité. His works were not widely known or circulated during his lifetime.

References

External links

Oeuvres de Jacques de Hemricourt (3 vols., Brussels, 1910—1931)

Volume 1, Le Miroir des nobles de Hesbaye, edited by C. de Borman with A. Bayot, (Brussels, 1910)

Volume 2, Le Miroir des nobles de Hesbaye: Codex diplomaticus — Tableaux généalogiques, edited by C. de Borman and E. Poncelet (Brussels, 1925)

Volume 3, Le Traité des Guerres d'Awans et de Waroux.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jacques de Hemricourt” as french historian (1333-1403). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jacques, Hemricourt and French.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1333, 1403, 1360, 1383—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1333-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jacques, Hemricourt and French providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jacques de Hemricourt”, the useful work is to connect “french historian (1333-1403)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 27, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q1678133. VIAF identifies the subject as 32352501. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1333, 1403, 1360 and 1383.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jacques de Hemricourt”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jacques de Hemricourt primary sources, Jacques de Hemricourt archive and Jacques research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jacques de Hemricourt”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Jacques de Hemricourt” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.