CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Minuscule 2814

manuscript of a commentary by Andreas of Caesarea on the Book of Revelation

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 12, 2025
Entity authorityQ1937616
Source-derived summary

Minuscule 2814 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), Aν20 (in Soden numbering), formerly labelled as 1rK in all catalogues, but subsequently renumbered as 2814 by Aland, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, dated palaeographically to the 12th century.

Description

The codex contains only the Book of Revelation with a commentary by Andreas of Caesarea. The last six verses were lost (22:16–21). Its text is written on a parchment in minuscule, in 1 column per page, 20 lines per page.

Its biblical Greek represents the 'Andreas text', which is related to, but not a pure representative of, the Byzantine text type. Aland placed it in Category V.

Rev. 1:5

λύσαντι ἡμᾶς ἐκ — P18, אc, A, C, 2020, 2081, 2814

λούσαντι ἡμᾶς ἀπο — P, 046, 94, 1006, 1859, 2042, 2065, 2073, 2138, 2432

History of the codex

This codex was chiefly used by Desiderius Erasmus as a basis for his first edition of the Novum Testamentum (1516). It was the only Greek manuscript of the Book of Revelation used by Erasmus. Erasmus translated the missing last six verses from the Vulgate back to Greek for his editions. As a result its readings plus his retranslation became a basis for the Textus Receptus.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Minuscule 2814” as manuscript of a commentary by Andreas of Caesarea on the Book of Revelation. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 2081, 1006, 1859—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1250. The account is most persuasive where Minuscule, manuscript and commentary can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as manuscript of a commentary by Andreas of Caesarea on the Book of Revelation. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1937616. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2020, 2081, 1006 and 1859.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Minuscule 2814”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Minuscule 2814 primary sources, Minuscule 2814 archive and Minuscule research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Minuscule 2814”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Minuscule 2814” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.