CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Thomas Minot

Roman Catholic archbishop

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ7792494 ↗
Source-derived summary

Thomas Minot, also spelt Mynot or Mynyot (died 10 July 1375) was an English-born judge and cleric in fourteenth-century Ireland. He was Archbishop of Dublin from 1363 to 1375. He is chiefly remembered for his extensive restoration works to St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin, and in particular for rebuilding the Cathedral's tower, which is still called Minot's Tower.

Early career

He came from a north of England family which had a tradition of service to the English Crown. He may have been a cousin of Laurence Minot, the poet, although almost nothing is known for certain of Laurence's life. Richard Mynot, who came to Ireland with Thomas and accompanied him on his final journey back to England, was probably his nephew.

He was presented to the living of Nothorpe, Lincolnshire in 1349, and to that of Seaton, Rutland in 1351. He was sent to Ireland in 1354 as Chancellor of St Mary's Cathedral, Limerick, and in 1356 he was appointed Third Baron of the Court of Exchequer (Ireland) to "supervise and hasten the interests of the King". He also served as Chief Escheator of Ireland in the late 1350s, and numerous entries in the Close Rolls for 1358 show that he was kept busy dealing with a flood of queries about the state of the Crown lands.

Unlike many of the medieval Irish Barons of the Exchequer, who were laymen (a fact which gave rise to frequent complaints about their ignorance of the law) Thomas had studied law at Oxford University (receiving the title "magister" in about 1349) and was an accomplished ecclesiastical lawyer.

Editorial summary

“Thomas Minot” enters the record as roman Catholic archbishop. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Thomas, Minot and Roman can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1375, 1363, 1349, 1351—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Thomas, Minot and Roman.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Thomas Minot” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Thomas, Minot and Roman provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7792494. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1375, 1363, 1349 and 1351.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Thomas Minot”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Thomas Minot primary sources, Thomas Minot archive and Thomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thomas Minot”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Thomas Minot” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.