CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development

Government ministry of Ghana

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 10, 2025
Entity authorityQ30689045 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Ministry of Regional Re-organisation is Government of Ghana ministry charged with the responsibility of supervising the creation of new regions in Ghana. The ministry is headed by Hon. Dan Botwe. It was created in January 2017 by President Akufo-Addo.

New Regions

President Akufo-Addo promised to split the Volta region into two separated regions namely the Volta Region in the South and the Oti Region in the North. The Western Region was also to be split into the Western and Western-north regions. The Northern Region was to be split into North East, Savannah and the Northern regions. The Brong Ahafo Region was also to be split into three sections, namely Bono, Bono East and Ahafo Region respectively.

Editorial summary

“Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development” enters the record as government ministry of Ghana. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ministry, Regional and Reorganization can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2017-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ministry, Regional and Reorganization.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ministry, Regional and Reorganization provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 10, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q30689045. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development primary sources, Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development archive and Ministry research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ministry of Regional Reorganization and Development” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.