CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Maria Francisca Bia

Dutch actress (1809-1889)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 10, 2024
Entity authorityQ4938961 ↗
Source-derived summary

Maria Francisca Bia known as Mimi Bia and as Mimi Engelman-Bia and Mimi de Vries-Bia (9 September 1809 – 13 July 1889) was a Dutch ballet dancer, opera singer (soprano) and dramatic stage actress. Starting her career as a ballet dancer, she had a parallel career as both a soprano opera singer as well as a dramatic stage actress at the Amsterdamse Schouwburg, where she had a dominant role within the Dutch theatre world. She was the manager director and owner of the theatre Utrechtse Schouwburg in Utrecht in 1875-1880.

Biography

Mimi Bia was born in Amsterdam to Jean Lambert Bia (1767–1829) and Catherine Rebecca Grave (1782–1846).

In 1828 she married the actor Reinier Engelman (1795–1845), director and manager of the Amsterdamse Schouwburg, and in 1865 to the actor Jan Eduard de Vries (1808–1875), director and manager of the theatre Utrechtse Schouwburg in Utrecht.

Her parents were both engaged as ballet dancers at the Amsterdamse Schouwburg, and Mimi Bia started her stage career as a ballet dancer in her childhood. She was given good critic as a ballet dancer. She was additionally given instruction in dramatic acting by Johanna Wattier and made her debut as an actor at the age of ten. She was given instruction in singing and made her debut in her third profession as an operatic society at the age of fourteen.

Mimi Bia made her formal debut at the Amsterdamse Schouwburg in 1826.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Maria Francisca Bia” is dutch actress (1809-1889). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Maria, Francisca and Dutch, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1809, 1889, 1875, 1880—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1809-09-09. For this dossier, Maria, Francisca and Dutch is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “dutch actress (1809-1889)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4938961. VIAF identifies the subject as 290249295. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1809, 1889, 1875 and 1880.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Maria Francisca Bia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Maria Francisca Bia primary sources, Maria Francisca Bia archive and Maria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Maria Francisca Bia”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Maria Francisca Bia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.