CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Miloš Đelmaš

Serbian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ279503
Source-derived summary

Miloš Đelmaš (Serbian Cyrillic: Милош Ђелмаш, born 4 June 1960) is a Serbian retired professional footballer who played as a midfielder.

Đelmaš earned his only cap for Yugoslavia in a September 1987 friendly match away against Italy, coming on as a 62nd-minute substitute for Semir Tuce.

Personal life

His cousin is rock musician Raša Đelmaš.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Miloš Đelmaš” as serbian footballer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Miloš, Đelmaš and Serbian.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1960, 1987—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1960-06-04. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Miloš, Đelmaš and Serbian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Miloš Đelmaš”, the useful work is to connect “serbian footballer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q279503. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1960 and 1987.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Miloš Đelmaš”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Miloš Đelmaš primary sources, Miloš Đelmaš archive and Miloš research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Miloš Đelmaš”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Miloš Đelmaš” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.