CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Milagro Mena

Costa Rican cyclist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 24, 2025
Entity authorityQ21622034 ↗
Source-derived summary

Milagro Mena Solano (born 30 April 1993) is a Costa Rican racing cyclist, who rides for UCI Women's Continental Team Soltec Iberoamérica. She rode in the women's road race at the 2015 UCI Road World Championships. She also represented Costa Rica at the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris in Women's road race, where she ultimately failed to finish the race.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Milagro Mena” as costa Rican cyclist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Milagro, Mena and Costa.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 2015, 2024—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1993-04-30. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Milagro, Mena and Costa providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Milagro Mena”, the useful work is to connect “costa Rican cyclist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 24, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q21622034. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1993, 2015 and 2024.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Milagro Mena”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Milagro Mena primary sources, Milagro Mena archive and Milagro research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Milagro Mena”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Milagro Mena” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.