CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mihail Litvinchuk

Belarusian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ6845149
Source-derived summary

Mihail Stepanovich Litvinchuk (Belarusian: Міхаіл Літвінчук; Russian: Михаил Степанович Литвинчук; born 21 June 1980) is a Belarusian former professional footballer who played as a forward.

Career

Born in Brest, Litvinchuk has spent most of his career playing football in the Belarusian Premier League. He has won the league twice with FC Dinamo Brest, once with FC Minsk and once with FC Gomel. He has also played abroad with Świt Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki and Podlasie Biała Podlaska.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Mihail Litvinchuk” is belarusian footballer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Mihail, Litvinchuk and Belarusian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1980—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1980-06-21. For this dossier, Mihail, Litvinchuk and Belarusian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “belarusian footballer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6845149. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1980.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mihail Litvinchuk”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mihail Litvinchuk primary sources, Mihail Litvinchuk archive and Mihail research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mihail Litvinchuk”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mihail Litvinchuk” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.