CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Mike Tyson Boxing

2000 Codemasters Software Company Limited, The Sports PlayStation

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ89019363 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mike Tyson Boxing, known in the UK as Prince Naseem Boxing, is a video game developed and published by Codemasters for PlayStation in 2000, and developed by Virtucraft and published by Ubi Soft for Game Boy Advance in 2002.

Reception

The game received "unfavorable" reviews on both platforms according to the review aggregation website Metacritic. Doug Trueman of NextGen said of the PlayStation version, "Although Mike Tyson's reputation would be hard pressed to get any lower, this game manages to do just that." Maxim gave the same console version a negative review, over a week before the game was released Stateside.

Editorial summary

“Mike Tyson Boxing” enters the record as 2000 Codemasters Software Company Limited, The Sports PlayStation. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mike, Tyson and Boxing can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2002—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Mike, Tyson and Boxing.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Mike Tyson Boxing” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mike, Tyson and Boxing provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q89019363. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000 and 2002.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mike Tyson Boxing”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mike Tyson Boxing primary sources, Mike Tyson Boxing archive and Mike research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mike Tyson Boxing”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mike Tyson Boxing” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.