CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali

2017 boxing match

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ136090335 ↗
Source-derived summary

Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali was a professional boxing match contested on December 2, 2017, for the WBO light middleweight title.

Background

Just prior to his title fight against Yoshihiro Kamegai, 36-year old four-division world champion Miguel Cotto announced that he would fight only once more after facing Kamegai before retiring at the end of the year. Cotto reiterated his intent following his defeat of Kamegai, stating that although he did not have an opponent in mind yet, he wished to stage his last fight in Madison Square Garden, where he had fought nine prior times and sported a 8–1 record. Cotto's wishes were answered as it was announced in September that a December 2 date at the venue had been secured. Though an opponent had not been named, Cotto mentioned that he would like to meet the winner of the upcoming Canelo Álvarez–Gennady Golovkin fight, stating that fighting the winner "would be a good way to go out." However, the Álvarez–Golovkin fight ended in a draw, leaving both fighters unavailable to fight Cotto as they pursued an immediate rematch. Instead, it was announced that Cotto would face little-known New York native Sadam Ali, a former Olympian and welterweight title contender who would be making his light middleweight debut. Golden Boy Promotions president Eric Gomez mentioned that they had engaged in talks with bigger named fighters such as Errol Spence Jr., Danny Garcia and then-WBC lightweight champion Mikey Garcia, who was willing to jump up three weight classes to face Cotto, but all eventually declined.

Cotto was ranked as the 6th best Light middleweight by TBRB.

Fight Details

Though he came into the fight as a considerable underdog, Ali managed to keep Cotto at bey in the early rounds with slick defense and counter-punching and came on strong in the latter rounds with efficient power-punching as he was able to score an upset unanimous decision victory with two scores of 115–113 and one score of 116–112. The fight was close as Cotto scored often with the jab (landing 55 to Ali's 17) and landed more overall punches (163 to Ali's 139) and held a two-point lead on two of the official scorecards, while the third scorecard was even going into the final four rounds.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali” is 2017 boxing match. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Miguel, Cotto and Sadam, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Miguel, Cotto and Sadam is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2017 boxing match” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136090335. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali primary sources, Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali archive and Miguel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Miguel Cotto vs. Sadam Ali” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.