Smaller midrashim
Open-knowledge reference entry

A number of midrashim exist which are smaller in size, and generally later in date, than those dealt with in the articles Midrash Haggadah and Midrash Halakah.
Despite their late date, some of these works preserve material from the Apocrypha and Philo of Alexandria. These small works, were in turn used by later larger works, such as Sefer haYashar (midrash). Important editors and researchers of this material include Abraham ben Elijah of Vilna, Adolf Jellinek, and Solomon Aaron Wertheimer.
Principal works
The chief of these works are:
Midrash Abba Gorion, a late midrash to the Book of Esther
Midrash Abkir, on the first two books of the Torah. Only fragments survive.
Midrash Al Yithallel, stories about David, Solomon, and the rich Korah
Midrash Aseret ha-Dibrot, a haggadah for Shavuot
Chronicle of Moses (or Divrei ha-Yamim shel Mosheh)
Midrash Eleh Ezkerah, on the execution of the ten sages by the Roman emperor Hadrian.
Midrash Eser Galiyyot, the ten exiles of the Jews up to the time of Hadrian.
Midrash Esfah, on verses from the books of Numbers and Deuteronomy. Only fragments survive.
The public source identifies “Smaller midrashim” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Smaller, midrashim and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Smaller midrashim”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7543645. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Smaller midrashim”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Smaller midrashim primary sources, Smaller midrashim archive and Smaller research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Smaller midrashim”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Smaller midrashim” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.