CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Schizolecis

species of fish

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ3764987 ↗
Source-derived summary

Schizolecis is a monospecific genus freshwater ray-finned fish belonging to the family Loricariidae, the suckermouth armoured catfishes, and the subfamily Hypoptopomatinae, the cascudinhos. The only species in the genus is Schizolecis guntheri, a species which is endemic to Brazil.

Taxonomy

Schizolecis was first proposed as a genus in 1984 by the Brazilian ichthyologists Heraldo A. Britski and Julio C. Garavello with Microlepidogaster guntheri as its only species, and designated as its type species. M. guntheri was first formally described in 1918 by the Brazilian zoologist Alípio de Miranda Ribeiro with its type locality given as the Ilha de Sao Sebastiao in the Brazilian state of São Paulo. Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes classified the genus Schizolecis in the subfamily Hypoptopomatinae, the cascudinhos, within the suckermouth armored catfish family Loricariidae.

Etymology

Schizolecis combines Schizo meaning "split" or "cleave" with lekos , which in this case the autors say means "plate", a reference to the plates on the sbout being the same size as those on the head. The specific name honours the specimen collector Francisco Günther, who collected specimens for the Museu Paulista, University of São Paulo, including holotype of this catfish.

Distribution and habitat

Schizolecis occurs mainly in coastal rivers of the Atlantic Forest in southeastern and southern Brazil. These fish inhabit streams with rocky and sandy bottom, mostly in shallows and backwaters up to 30 centimetres (12 in) deep, with slow water flow.

Appearance and anatomy

Schizolecis reaches a maximum length of 4.0 centimetres (1.6 in) SL in males and 3 cm (1.2 in) SL in females.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Schizolecis” as species of fish. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 1918—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Schizolecis, species and fish can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of fish. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3764987. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1984 and 1918.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Schizolecis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Schizolecis primary sources, Schizolecis archive and Schizolecis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Schizolecis”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Schizolecis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.