Micrite
limestone constituent formed of calcareous particles formed by the recrystallization of lime mud

Micrite is a limestone constituent formed of fine calcareous particles ranging in diameter up to five μm formed by the recrystallization of lime mud.
The term was coined in 1959 by sedimentary petrologist Robert L. Folk as part of his carbonate rock classification system. Micrite is derived from MICRocrystalline calcITE. In the Folk classification micrite is a carbonate rock dominated by fine-grained calcite. Carbonate rocks that contain fine-grained calcite in addition to allochems are named intramicrite, oomicrite, biomicrite or pelmicrite under the Folk classification depending on the dominant allochem.
Micrite is lime mud, carbonate of mud grade. Micrite, as a component of carbonate rocks, can occur as a matrix, as micrite envelopes around allochems, or as peloids. The origin of micrites remains a problem in carbonate sedimentology because the processes that generate them are not unique. Micrite can be generated through multiple processes. In lakes and some marine environments, lime mud that could become micrite can form chemically or biochemically through whiting events, whereas in warm, stratified marine waters, it may form chemically. Alternatively, microbial process known as micritization may lead to micrite formation.
“Micrite” enters the record as limestone constituent formed of calcareous particles formed by the recrystallization of lime mud. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Micrite, limestone and constituent can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Micrite” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Micrite, limestone and constituent provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1761229. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1959.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Micrite”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Micrite primary sources, Micrite archive and Micrite research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Micrite”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Micrite” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.