CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

London Development Agency

regional development agency for Greater London

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ6670331
Source-derived summary

The London Development Agency (LDA) was the regional development agency for the London region in England from July 2000 until 31 March 2012.

History

The LDA was established as a functional body of the Greater London Authority in July 2000.

As mayor, in 2008, Boris Johnson commissioned a forensic audit of the London Development Agency which recommended that it should only commission projects rather than develop projects directly. In 2010, Boris Johnson announced that he would seek the transfer of the functions of the LDA to the GLA.

The agency was closed on 31 March 2012 as a result of the coalition government's 2010 spending review. The Localism Act 2011 abolished the LDA. A subsidiary of the GLA, GLA Land and Property, was formed to take on the LDA's assets and liabilities.

Remit

The remit of the LDA was to work in partnership with local authorities, voluntary groups, training institutions, businesses and regeneration partnerships.

The LDA was responsible for the compulsory purchase, the clearing of land and the establishment of relocation strategies. One project the LDA did this for was the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park.

Headquarters

From its establishment until 2006, the LDA was based at 58-60 Devon House, St Katharine's Way, Tower Hamlets. From 2006 until its abolition, the LDA was based at Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road, Southwark.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “London Development Agency” as regional development agency for Greater London. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around London, Development and Agency.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2012, 2008, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1999-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with London, Development and Agency providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “London Development Agency”, the useful work is to connect “regional development agency for Greater London” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6670331. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2000, 2012, 2008 and 2010.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “London Development Agency”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow London Development Agency primary sources, London Development Agency archive and London research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “London Development Agency”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from London Development Agency” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.