CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Michaela Marksová

Czech politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ15057916 ↗
Source-derived summary

Michaela Marksová (born Michaela Tominová 20 March 1969) is a Czech politician. From January 2014, she was the Czech Minister of Labour and Social Affairs in the government of Bohuslav Sobotka, and the spokesperson on human rights and families, leaving the posts in December 2017 following legislative elections. Since 2006, she has been a council member for the Czech Social Democratic Party in the Prague 2 district council.

She is a niece of the philosopher Julius Tomin and Zdenka Tomin, former Charter 77 speaker.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Michaela Marksová” is czech politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Michaela, Marksová and Czech, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 2014, 2017, 2006—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Michaela, Marksová and Czech is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “czech politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15057916. The first chronological checks are 1969, 2014, 2017 and 2006.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Michaela Marksová”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Michaela Marksová primary sources, Michaela Marksová archive and Michaela research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Michaela Marksová”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Michaela Marksová” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.