Michael Glanzberg
American analytic philosopher
Michael Glanzberg is an American analytic philosopher specializing in philosophy of language and philosophical logic who is currently a professor in philosophy at Rutgers University. He received his PhD in philosophy from Harvard University, where Charles Parsons and Warren Goldfarb supervised his dissertation. Glanzberg has previously held faculty positions at Northwestern University, University of California, Davis, Erindale College at the University of Toronto, and MIT. Often working at the intersection of logic and the philosophy of language, Glanzberg is recognized for his work on quantification, paradox, semantics, theories of truth, and the role of context in various linguistic settings. He frequently collaborates with Jc Beall. He serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief for the journal Linguistics and Philosophy and edited The Oxford Handbook of Truth (2018).
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Michael Glanzberg” is american analytic philosopher. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Michael, Glanzberg and American, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “american analytic philosopher” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q99797474. VIAF identifies the subject as 305744436. The Library of Congress control number is ns2018002369. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Michael Glanzberg”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Michael Glanzberg primary sources, Michael Glanzberg archive and Michael research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Michael Glanzberg”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Michael Glanzberg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.