CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Micael Lundmark

Swedish snowboarder

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2025
Entity authorityQ11778314
Source-derived summary

Micael Lundmark (27 September 1986 – 16 June 2023) was a Swedish snowboarder. He competed in the men's halfpipe event at the 2006 Winter Olympics.

He died while filming himself vaulting from the bridge Västerbron into Riddarfjärden in Stockholm, Sweden. His remains were found on 27 August 2023.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Micael Lundmark” as swedish snowboarder. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Micael, Lundmark and Swedish.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1986, 2023, 2006—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1986-09-27. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Micael, Lundmark and Swedish providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Micael Lundmark”, the useful work is to connect “swedish snowboarder” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q11778314. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1986, 2023 and 2006.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Micael Lundmark”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Micael Lundmark primary sources, Micael Lundmark archive and Micael research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Micael Lundmark”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Micael Lundmark” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.