CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mia Blake

New Zealand actress

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ6827170 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mia Blake (née Mia Taumoepeau) is a New Zealand based actress. She won the 2006 New Zealand Screen Award for Best Performance by Actress in a Supporting Role for her role in No. 2.

Career

In 2000, Blake secured a role in film Hopeless as Maryann Moore. Taumoepeau then starred in the sci-fi drama series The Tribe in which she portrayed the character of Ginny. She later reprised the role of Maryann in a television series spin-off titled Lovebites.

2006 saw her playing Charlene in No. 2 and in 2007 she featured in The Tattooist playing a beautiful Samoan girl, Sina.

Personal life

Blake was born in Tonga to Togan and Scottish parents.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mia Blake” as new Zealand actress. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Blake, Zealand and actress.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2000, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Blake, Zealand and actress providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mia Blake”, the useful work is to connect “new Zealand actress” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6827170. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2000 and 2007.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mia Blake”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mia Blake primary sources, Mia Blake archive and Blake research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mia Blake”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mia Blake” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.