CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ55622917 ↗
Source-derived summary

Metropolitan sessions courts are a category of sessions court located in the metropolitan cities of Bangladesh. These courts function under the authority of metropolitan sessions judges and deal exclusively with criminal cases.

As per the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908, a sessions court is to be established by the government in every metropolitan city. Initially, two types of courts, the courts of sessions and the courts of magistrates were recognized by the code. The code was amended in 1976 with the introduction of the metropolitan police and came into effect in 1979. This amended ordinance made it essential for the government to establish the separate metropolitan sessions courts for metropolitan areas. Currently, eight metropolitan courts are functioning in Bangladesh.

Structure

Metropolitan courts of sessions are presided over by metropolitan sessions judges. It has started functioning in 1999.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1908, 1976, 1979, 1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Metropolitan, sessions and courts can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q55622917. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1908, 1976, 1979 and 1999.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh primary sources, Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh archive and Metropolitan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Metropolitan sessions courts in Bangladesh” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.