CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell

technique to find asymptotic expansions

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ116207247 ↗
Source-derived summary

In asymptotic analysis, the method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell is a technique to find asymptotic expansions for contour integrals. It was developed as an extension of the steepest descent method for getting uniform asymptotic expansions in the case of coalescing saddle points. The method was published in 1957 by Clive R. Chester, Bernard Friedman and Fritz Ursell.

Method

Setting

We study integrals of the form

I

(

α

,

N

)

:=

∫

C

e

−

N

f

(

α

,

t

)

g

(

α

,

t

)

d

t

,

{\displaystyle I(\alpha ,N):=\int _{C}e^{-Nf(\alpha ,t)}g(\alpha ,t)dt,}

where

C

{\displaystyle C}

is a contour and

f

,

g

{\displaystyle f,g}

are two analytic functions in the complex variable

t

{\displaystyle t}

and continuous in

α

{\displaystyle \alpha }

.

N

{\displaystyle N}

is a large number.

Suppose we have two saddle points

t

+

,

t

−

{\displaystyle t_{+},t_{-}}

of

f

(

α

,

t

)

{\displaystyle f(\alpha ,t)}

with multiplicity

1

{\displaystyle 1}

that depend on a parameter

α

{\displaystyle \alpha }

. If now an

α

0

{\displaystyle \alpha _{0}}

exists, such that both saddle points coalescent to a new saddle point

t

0

{\displaystyle t_{0}}

with multiplicity

2

{\displaystyle 2}

, then the steepest descent method no longer gives uniform asymptotic expansions.

Procedure

Suppose there are two simple saddle points

t

−

:=

t

−

(

α

)

{\displaystyle t_{-}:=t_{-}(\alpha )}

and

t

+

:=

t

+

(

α

)

{\displaystyle t_{+}:=t_{+}(\alpha )}

of

f

{\displaystyle f}

and suppose that they coalescent in the point

t

0

:=

t

0

(

α

0

)

{\displaystyle t_{0}:=t_{0}(\alpha _{0})}

.

We start with the cubic transformation

t

↦

w

{\displaystyle t\mapsto w}

of

f

(

α

,

t

)

{\displaystyle f(\alpha ,t)}

, this means we introduce a new complex variable

w

{\displaystyle w}

and write

f

(

α

,

t

)

=

1

3

w

3

−

η

(

α

)

w

+

A

(

α

)

,

{\displaystyle f(\alpha ,t)={\tfrac {1}{3}}w^{3}-\eta (\alpha )w+A(\alpha ),}

where the coefficients

η

:=

η

(

α

)

{\displaystyle \eta :=\eta (\alpha )}

and

A

:=

A

(

α

)

{\displaystyle A:=A(\alpha )}

will be determined later.

We have

d

t

d

w

=

w

2

−

η

f

t

(

α

,

t

)

,

{\displaystyle {\frac {dt}{dw}}={\frac {w^{2}-\eta }{f_{t}(\alpha ,t)}},}

so the cubic transformation will be analytic and injective only if

d

t

/

d

w

{\displaystyle dt/dw}

and

d

w

/

d

t

{\displaystyle dw/dt}

are neither

0

{\displaystyle 0}

nor

∞

{\displaystyle \infty }

.

Editorial summary

“Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell” enters the record as technique to find asymptotic expansions. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Method, Chester and Friedman can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1957—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Method, Chester and Friedman.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Method, Chester and Friedman provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q116207247. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1957.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell primary sources, Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell archive and Method research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Method of Chester–Friedman–Ursell” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.