CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mesthles

son of Talaemenes in Greek mythology

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ3855396
Source-derived summary

In Greek mythology, Mesthles (Ancient Greek: Μέσθλης, romanized: Mésthlēs) was one of the Trojan Leaders.

Family

Mesthles was the son of Talaemenes and a Gygaean nymph (Gygaea). He was the brother of Antiphus.

Mythology

Mesthles and his brother were the captains of the Maeonians who participated in the Trojan War. The Meiones were Lydian people whose city is today's Sardis.

Notes

References

Apollodorus, The Library with an English Translation by Sir James George Frazer, F.B.A., F.R.S. in 2 Volumes, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1921. ISBN 0-674-99135-4. Online version at the Perseus Digital Library. Greek text available from the same website.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mesthles” as son of Talaemenes in Greek mythology. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Mesthles, Talaemenes and Greek.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1921—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Mesthles, Talaemenes and Greek providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mesthles”, the useful work is to connect “son of Talaemenes in Greek mythology” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3855396. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1921.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mesthles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mesthles primary sources, Mesthles archive and Mesthles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mesthles”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mesthles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.