Meneleus of Menat
French Monk
Saint Meneleus (or Mauvier, Menele, Meneve, Menevius, Ménélée; died 720) was a French monk who founded the Menat Abbey.
12th-century sources
According to the 12th-century Vita Menelei and Vita S. Theofredi, Meneleus was descended from the Roman emperor Heraclius.
He fled from home to avoid a marriage and met Theofredus, abbot of Saint-Chaffre.
Meneleus entered this monastery and was trained by the abbot for several years.
An angel then directed him to return to the spot where he had met Theofredus, where he fell asleep below an oak.
The angel reappeared and told him to build a monastery on the spot, which became Menat Abbey.
His female relatives could not live without him, and after a desperate search found him at Menat.
A cella was built for them 6 kilometres (3.7 mi) away, with the church of Sainte-Marie of
Lisseul.
Monks of Ramsgate accounts
The monks of St Augustine's Abbey, Ramsgate wrote in their Book of Saints (1921),
Meneleus (Meneve) (St.) Abbot. (July 22)(8th century) In French the name is rendered Menele or Mauvier.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Meneleus of Menat” is french Monk. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Meneleus, Menat and French, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “french Monk” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 30, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q3333230. VIAF identifies the subject as 46136329. The Library of Congress control number is n2003043150. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1921.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Meneleus of Menat”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Meneleus of Menat primary sources, Meneleus of Menat archive and Meneleus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Meneleus of Menat”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Meneleus of Menat” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.