CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Steinhaus–Moser notation

notation for extremely large numbers

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ2092313
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, Steinhaus–Moser notation is a notation for expressing certain large numbers. It is an extension (devised by Leo Moser) of Hugo Steinhaus's polygon notation.

Definitions

a number n in a triangle means nn.

a number n in a square is equivalent to "the number n inside n triangles, which are all nested."

a number n in a pentagon is equivalent to "the number n inside n squares, which are all nested."

etc.: n written in an (m + 1)-sided polygon is equivalent to "the number n inside n nested m-sided polygons". In a series of nested polygons, they are associated inward. The number n inside two triangles is equivalent to nn inside one triangle, which is equivalent to nn raised to the power of nn.

Steinhaus defined only the triangle, the square, and the circle , which is equivalent to the pentagon defined above.

Special values

Steinhaus defined:

mega is the number equivalent to 2 in a circle: ②

megiston is the number equivalent to 10 in a circle: ⑩

Moser's number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon". Megagon is here the name of a polygon with "mega" sides (not to be confused with the polygon with one million sides).

Alternative notations:

use the functions square(x) and triangle(x)

let M(n, m, p) be the number represented by the number n in m nested p-sided polygons; then the rules are:

M

(

n

,

1

,

3

)

=

n

n

{\displaystyle M(n,1,3)=n^{n}}

M

(

n

,

1

,

p

+

1

)

=

M

(

n

,

n

,

p

)

{\displaystyle M(n,1,p+1)=M(n,n,p)}

M

(

n

,

m

+

1

,

p

)

=

M

(

M

(

n

,

1

,

p

)

,

m

,

p

)

{\displaystyle M(n,m+1,p)=M(M(n,1,p),m,p)}

and

mega =

M

(

2

,

1

,

5

)

{\displaystyle M(2,1,5)}

megiston =

M

(

10

,

1

,

5

)

{\displaystyle M(10,1,5)}

moser =

M

(

2

,

1

,

M

(

2

,

1

,

5

)

)

{\displaystyle M(2,1,M(2,1,5))}

Mega

A mega, ②, is already a very large number, since ② =

square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) =

square(triangle(22)) =

square(triangle(4)) =

square(44) =

square(256) =

triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) [256 triangles] =

triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) [255 triangles] ~

triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2317 × 10616)...))) [254 triangles]

...

Editorial summary

“Steinhaus–Moser notation” enters the record as notation for extremely large numbers. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Steinhaus, Moser and notation can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 378-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Steinhaus, Moser and notation.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Steinhaus–Moser notation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Steinhaus, Moser and notation provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2092313. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Steinhaus–Moser notation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Steinhaus–Moser notation primary sources, Steinhaus–Moser notation archive and Steinhaus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Steinhaus–Moser notation”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Steinhaus–Moser notation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.