CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mees Bakker

Dutch association football player (2001-)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 23, 2025
Entity authorityQ56257860
Source-derived summary

Mees Bakker (born 11 March 2001) is a Dutch professional footballer who plays as a goalkeeper for Eerste Divisie club Den Bosch.

Club career

AZ

Bakker started his youth career at hometown club HSV Heiloo before joining the academy of AZ. He made his professional debut for reserve team Jong AZ on the first matchday of the 2018–19 Eerste Divisie. At home against Almere City, he was named in the starting lineup by coach Michel Vonk and played the full game. However, he conceded three goals within the first thirty minutes in an eventual 3–2 loss.

Prior to the 2020–21 season, Bakker was included in the first team as the new third-choice goalkeeper. Additionally, he continued to play for the reserves.

De Graafschap

On 7 July 2022, Bakker joined De Graafschap on a season-long loan with an option to buy. He made his debut for the club on 19 May 2023 in a 3–0 victory against Den Bosch.

De Graafschap made the transfer permanent on 1 June 2023, and Bakker signed a one-year contract, with an option for a second year. He began the 2023–24 season as the starting goalkeeper, assuming the position after Hidde Jurjus departed for Groningen.

Editorial summary

“Mees Bakker” enters the record as dutch association football player (2001-). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mees, Bakker and Dutch can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001, 2018, 2020, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Mees, Bakker and Dutch.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Mees Bakker” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mees, Bakker and Dutch provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q56257860. The first chronological checks are 2001, 2018, 2020 and 2022.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mees Bakker”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mees Bakker primary sources, Mees Bakker archive and Mees research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mees Bakker”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mees Bakker” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.