Farid Ahmed Shibli
Bangladeshi judge

Farid Ahmed Shibli is a retired justice of the Bangladesh Supreme Court and member of the Justice Division Reform Commission.
Career
Shibli and Justice Tariq ul Hakim expressed embarrassment to hear a petition in December 2015 challenging the legality of parliamentary membership of Nizam Uddin Hazari and sent the petition to the chief justice.
Shibli was appointed additional judge of the High Court Division in 2015 along with nine others.
The government of Bangladesh did not made Shibli a permanent judge of the High Court Division in February 2017 along with Justice JN Deb Chowdhury who had died. It made eight judges of the High Court Division permanent.
In August 2024 after the fall of the Sheikh Hasina led Awami League government, Shibli was appointed member of a commission looking into enforced disappearance led by Justice Moyeenul Islam Chowdhury. He was also made a member of the Justice Division Reform Commission led by Justice Shah Abu Naeem Mominur Rahman.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Farid Ahmed Shibli” as bangladeshi judge. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as bangladeshi judge. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131322100. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2017 and 2024.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Farid Ahmed Shibli”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Farid Ahmed Shibli primary sources, Farid Ahmed Shibli archive and Farid research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Farid Ahmed Shibli”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Farid Ahmed Shibli” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.