CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

McBoyle v. United States

United States Supreme Court case

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ6800035 ↗
Source-derived summary

McBoyle v. United States, 283 U.S. 25 (1931), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding whether the theft of an airplane was illegal under federal law, given that the law only criminalized theft of a "vehicle."

Background

William McBoyle transported a plane that he knew to be stolen from Ottawa, Illinois to Guymon, Oklahoma and was arrested. He was accused of violating the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act on the theory that the plane was a type of "vehicle" covered by the act. He was sentenced to three years' imprisonment and a fine of $2,000 (equivalent to $38,000 in 2025). The judgment was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on the question of whether the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act applied to aircraft.

Case

The petitioners claimed that since the act did not specifically mention aircraft, it should not apply to McBoyle's case. Furthermore, the petitioners argued that Congress likely did not intend to criminalize the theft of aircraft when the law was passed, since airplanes barely existed at the time.

Decision

The court held that, since other acts, such as the Tariff Act of 1930, specifically excluded aircraft in their definitions of a vehicle, the law must be interpreted narrowly. Justice Holmes stated:

Although it is not likely that a criminal will carefully consider the text of the law before he murders or steals, it is reasonable that a fair warning should be given to the world in language that the common world will understand, of what the law intends to do if a certain line is passed.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “McBoyle v. United States” is united States Supreme Court case. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through McBoyle, United and States, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1931, 2025, 1930—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, McBoyle, United and States is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “united States Supreme Court case” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6800035. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1931, 2025 and 1930.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “McBoyle v. United States”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow McBoyle v. United States primary sources, McBoyle v. United States archive and McBoyle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “McBoyle v. United States”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “McBoyle v. United States” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.