CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Minimax

decision rule used for minimizing the possible loss for a worst case scenario

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ751319 ↗
Source-derived summary

Minimax (sometimes Minmax, MM or saddle point) is a decision rule used in artificial intelligence, decision theory, combinatorial game theory, statistics, and philosophy for minimizing the possible loss for a worst case (maximum loss) scenario. When dealing with gains, it is referred to as "maximin" – to maximize the minimum gain. Originally formulated for several-player zero-sum game theory, covering both the cases where players take alternate moves and those where they make simultaneous moves, it has also been extended to more complex games and to general decision-making in the presence of uncertainty.

Game theory

In general games

The maximin value is the highest value that the player can be sure to get without knowing the actions of the other players; equivalently, it is the lowest value the other players can force the player to receive when they know the player's action. Its formal definition is:

v

i

_

=

max

a

i

min

a

−

i

v

i

(

a

i

,

a

−

i

)

{\displaystyle {\underline {v_{i}}}=\max _{a_{i}}\min _{a_{-i}}{v_{i}(a_{i},a_{-i})}}

Where:

i is the index of the player of interest.

−

i

{\displaystyle -i}

denotes all other players except player i.

a

i

{\displaystyle a_{i}}

is the action taken by player i.

a

−

i

{\displaystyle a_{-i}}

denotes the actions taken by all other players.

v

i

{\displaystyle v_{i}}

is the value function of player i.

Calculating the maximin value of a player is done in a worst-case approach: for each possible action of the player, we check all possible actions of the other players and determine the worst possible combination of actions – the one that gives player i the smallest value.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Minimax” as decision rule used for minimizing the possible loss for a worst case scenario. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Minimax, decision and rule.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 274-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Minimax, decision and rule providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Minimax”, the useful work is to connect “decision rule used for minimizing the possible loss for a worst case scenario” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q751319. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Minimax”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Minimax primary sources, Minimax archive and Minimax research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Minimax”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Minimax” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.