Matthew 27
Gospel according to Matthew, chapter 27

Matthew 27 is the 27th chapter in the Gospel of Matthew, part of the New Testament in the Christian Bible. This chapter contains Matthew's record of the day of the trial, crucifixion and burial of Jesus. Scottish theologian William Robertson Nicoll notes that "the record of this single day is very nearly one-ninth of the whole book".
Text
The original text was written in Koine Greek. This chapter is divided into 66 verses.
Textual witnesses
Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter are:
Papyrus 104 (AD ~250; extant verses 34–37, 43, 45)
Codex Vaticanus (325–350)
Codex Sinaiticus (330–360)
Codex Bezae (c. 400; extant verses 1, 13–66)
Codex Washingtonianus (c. 400)
Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (c. 450; extant verses 1–10, 47–66)
Papyrus 105 (5th/6th century; extant verses 62–64)
Codex Purpureus Rossanensis (6th century)
Codex Petropolitanus Purpureus (6th century; extant verses 27–33)
Old Testament references
Matthew 27:34: Psalm 69:21: Alexander Kirkpatrick notes that "allusion seems to be made to this passage ... though it is not actually quoted".
“Matthew 27” enters the record as gospel according to Matthew, chapter 27. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Matthew, Gospel and according can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Matthew 27” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Matthew, Gospel and according provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6789872. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Matthew 27”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Matthew 27 primary sources, Matthew 27 archive and Matthew research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Matthew 27”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Matthew 27” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.