CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Matthew 26

Gospel according to Matthew, chapter 26

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ6789867 ↗
Source-derived summary

Matthew 26 is the 26th chapter of the Gospel of Matthew, part of the New Testament of the Christian Bible. This chapter covers the beginning of the Passion of Jesus narrative, which continues to Matthew 28; it contains the narratives of the Jewish leaders' plot to kill Jesus, Judas Iscariot's agreement to betray Jesus to Caiphas, the Last Supper with the Twelve Apostles and institution of the Eucharist, the Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane and the subsequent vindication of Jesus' predictions, of betrayal by one of the twelve Apostles, and that he will, in the Denial of Peter, be disowned by his closest follower, Saint Peter.

Text

The original text was written in Koine Greek. This chapter is divided into 75 verses, more than any other chapter in this gospel. Protestant theologian Heinrich Meyer identifies 32 verses in which there are critical variations between different early manuscripts and critical editions.

Textual witnesses

Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter are:

Papyrus 64 (Magdalen Papyrus) (late 2nd/3rd century; extant: verses 7–8, 10, 14–15)

Papyrus 37 (~260; extant verses 19–37)

Papyrus 53 (3rd century; extant verses 29–35)

Codex Vaticanus (325–50)

Codex Sinaiticus (330–60)

Codex Bezae (c. 400)

Codex Washingtonianus (c. 400)

Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (c. 450)

Codex Purpureus Rossanensis (6th century)

Codex Petropolitanus Purpureus (6th century; extant verses 58–64).

Old Testament references

Matthew 26:38: Psalm 42:5.

Editorial summary

“Matthew 26” enters the record as gospel according to Matthew, chapter 26. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Matthew, Gospel and according can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 227-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Matthew, Gospel and according.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Matthew 26” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Matthew, Gospel and according provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6789867. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Matthew 26”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Matthew 26 primary sources, Matthew 26 archive and Matthew research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Matthew 26”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Matthew 26” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.