CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Matthew 22

Gospel according to Matthew, chapter 22

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ6789862 ↗
Source-derived summary

Matthew 22 is the twenty-second chapter in the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament section of the Christian Bible. Jesus continues his final ministry in Jerusalem before his Passion. Teaching in the Temple, Jesus enters into debate successively with the Pharisees, allied with the Herodians, the Sadducees, and a lawyer, ultimately silencing them all.

Text

The original text was written in Koine Greek. This chapter is divided into 46 verses.

The narrative can be divided into the following subsections:

Parable of the Great Banquet (22:1–14)

Render unto Caesar... (22:15–22)

Marriage at the Resurrection (22:23–33)

Great Commandment (22:34–40)

"Is the Messiah the son of David?" (22:41–46)

Textual witnesses

Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter are:

Codex Vaticanus (AD 325–350)

Codex Sinaiticus (330–360)

Codex Bezae (c. 400)

Codex Washingtonianus (c. 400)

Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (c. 450)

Codex Purpureus Rossanensis (6th century)

Codex Sinopensis (6th century; extant verses 1–7, 13–14, 32–34)

Old Testament references

Matthew 22:32: Exodus 3:6

Matthew 22:37: Deuteronomy 6:5

Matthew 22:39: Leviticus 19:18

Matthew 22:44: Psalm 110:1

The wedding feast (22:1–14)

Dale Allison notes that the passage consists of an introduction (verse 1), the parable itself (verses 2–13b) and a commentary (verses 13c and 14: there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, for many are called, but few are chosen).

Editorial summary

“Matthew 22” enters the record as gospel according to Matthew, chapter 22. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Matthew, Gospel and according can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 215-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Matthew, Gospel and according.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Matthew 22” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Matthew, Gospel and according provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6789862. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Matthew 22”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Matthew 22 primary sources, Matthew 22 archive and Matthew research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Matthew 22”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Matthew 22” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.