CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Matthew 16

Gospel according to Matthew, chapter 16

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ6789825 ↗
Source-derived summary

Matthew 16 is the sixteenth chapter in the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament section of the Christian Bible. Jesus begins a journey to Jerusalem from the vicinity of Caesarea Philippi, near the southwestern base of Mount Hermon. Verse 24 speaks of his disciples "following him".

The narrative can be divided into the following subsections:

No sign except the Sign of Jonah (16:1–4)

The yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees (16:5–12)

Peter's confession (16:13–20)

Jesus predicts his death (16:21–26)

Return of the Son of Man (16:27–28)

Text

The original text was written in Koine Greek. This chapter is divided into 28 verses.

Textual witnesses

Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter are:

Codex Vaticanus (325–350)

Codex Sinaiticus (330–360)

Codex Bezae (c. 400)

Codex Washingtonianus (c. 400)

Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (c. 450)

Codex Purpureus Rossanensis (6th century)

Codex Petropolitanus Purpureus (6th century; extant verses 1–6)

Codex Sinopensis (6th century; extant verses 1–18)

Locations

Matthew 15 ends with Jesus sending the multitude of his followers away and He and his disciples sail to Magdala (or Magadan) on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee. In Matthew 16:1 the Pharisees and Sadducees come to him, presumably in the same location.

Editorial summary

“Matthew 16” enters the record as gospel according to Matthew, chapter 16. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Matthew, Gospel and according can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 201-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Matthew, Gospel and according.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Matthew 16” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Matthew, Gospel and according provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6789825. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Matthew 16”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Matthew 16 primary sources, Matthew 16 archive and Matthew research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Matthew 16”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Matthew 16” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.