Matheus Serafim
Brazilian footballer
Matheus Bonadiman Serafim (born 14 May 1998) is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays as a right winger for Daegu FC.
Career
Guarani
Born in Cachoeiro do Itapemirim, Espírito Santo, Serafim only played amateur football in his home state before joining Guarani's youth sides in 2017, aged already 18, after a trial period. He made his senior debut with the club on 22 July of that year, coming on as a second-half substitute for Caíque in a 1–1 away draw against CRB.
Portugal
On 31 August 2018, after being rarely used, Serafim moved abroad and joined Portuguese LigaPro side Oliveirense on a three-year contract. He made his debut abroad on 22 September, replacing compatriot Alef Manga in a 1–1 home draw against Porto B, but also featured rarely for his new side.
On 18 July 2019, Serafim moved to Alverca. However, he only featured with the B-team in the Lison FA Second Division.
Return to Brazil
Ahead of the 2020 season, Serafim returned to his home country and joined Primavera. In October of that year, he was registered in the squad of União Barbarense for the Campeonato Paulista Segunda Divisão, before moving to Monte Azul the following February.
On 3 June 2021, Serafim signed for Série D side Portuguesa. He began the 2022 season at Campeonato Paulista Série A3 side União Suzano, before being announced at Retrô on 18 May.
Seafim renewed his contract with Retrô in October 2022, and helped the side to reach the 2023 Campeonato Pernambucano finals.
“Matheus Serafim” enters the record as brazilian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Matheus, Serafim and Brazilian can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Matheus Serafim” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Matheus, Serafim and Brazilian provides the most credible route into that argument.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q126075823. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Matheus Serafim”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Matheus Serafim primary sources, Matheus Serafim archive and Matheus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Matheus Serafim”?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Matheus Serafim” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.