CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Masty district

district of Belarus

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 10, 2025
Entity authorityQ959364
Source-derived summary

Masty district (Belarusian: Мастоўскі раён; Russian: Мостовский район) is a district (raion) of Grodno region in Belarus. The administrative centre is Masty. As of 2024, it has a population of 25,210.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Masty district” is district of Belarus. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Masty, district and Belarus, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1940-01-15. For this dossier, Masty, district and Belarus is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “district of Belarus” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 10, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q959364. VIAF identifies the subject as 147751908. The Library of Congress control number is n81008015. Authority coordinates are 53.400, 24.533. 2 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2024.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Masty district”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Masty district primary sources, Masty district archive and Masty research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Masty district”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Masty district” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.