Martin measure
Open-knowledge reference entry

In descriptive set theory, the Martin measure is a filter on the set of Turing degrees of sets of natural numbers, named after Donald A. Martin. Under the axiom of determinacy it can be shown to be an ultrafilter.
Definition
Let
D
{\displaystyle D}
be the set of Turing degrees of sets of natural numbers. Given some equivalence class
[
X
]
∈
D
{\displaystyle [X]\in D}
, we may define the cone (or upward cone) of
[
X
]
{\displaystyle [X]}
as the set of all Turing degrees
[
Y
]
{\displaystyle [Y]}
such that
X
≤
T
Y
{\displaystyle X\leq _{T}Y}
; that is, the set of Turing degrees that are "at least as complex" as
X
{\displaystyle X}
under Turing reduction. In order-theoretic terms, the cone of
[
X
]
{\displaystyle [X]}
is the upper set of
[
X
]
{\displaystyle [X]}
.
Assuming the axiom of determinacy, the cone lemma states that if A is a set of Turing degrees, either A includes a cone or the complement of A contains a cone. It is similar to Wadge's lemma for Wadge degrees, and is important for the following result.
We say that a set
A
{\displaystyle A}
of Turing degrees has measure 1 under the Martin measure exactly when
A
{\displaystyle A}
contains some cone. Since it is possible, for any
A
{\displaystyle A}
, to construct a game in which player I has a winning strategy exactly when
A
{\displaystyle A}
contains a cone and in which player II has a winning strategy exactly when the complement of
A
{\displaystyle A}
contains a cone, the axiom of determinacy implies that the measure-1 sets of Turing degrees form an ultrafilter.
Consequences
It is easy to show that a countable intersection of cones is itself a cone; the Martin measure is therefore a countably complete filter.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Martin measure” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Martin, measure and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q6776970. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Martin measure”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Martin measure primary sources, Martin measure archive and Martin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Martin measure”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Martin measure” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.