CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Martin measure

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 4, 2023
Entity authorityQ6776970
Source-derived summary

In descriptive set theory, the Martin measure is a filter on the set of Turing degrees of sets of natural numbers, named after Donald A. Martin. Under the axiom of determinacy it can be shown to be an ultrafilter.

Definition

Let

D

{\displaystyle D}

be the set of Turing degrees of sets of natural numbers. Given some equivalence class

[

X

]

D

{\displaystyle [X]\in D}

, we may define the cone (or upward cone) of

[

X

]

{\displaystyle [X]}

as the set of all Turing degrees

[

Y

]

{\displaystyle [Y]}

such that

X

T

Y

{\displaystyle X\leq _{T}Y}

; that is, the set of Turing degrees that are "at least as complex" as

X

{\displaystyle X}

under Turing reduction. In order-theoretic terms, the cone of

[

X

]

{\displaystyle [X]}

is the upper set of

[

X

]

{\displaystyle [X]}

.

Assuming the axiom of determinacy, the cone lemma states that if A is a set of Turing degrees, either A includes a cone or the complement of A contains a cone. It is similar to Wadge's lemma for Wadge degrees, and is important for the following result.

We say that a set

A

{\displaystyle A}

of Turing degrees has measure 1 under the Martin measure exactly when

A

{\displaystyle A}

contains some cone. Since it is possible, for any

A

{\displaystyle A}

, to construct a game in which player I has a winning strategy exactly when

A

{\displaystyle A}

contains a cone and in which player II has a winning strategy exactly when the complement of

A

{\displaystyle A}

contains a cone, the axiom of determinacy implies that the measure-1 sets of Turing degrees form an ultrafilter.

Consequences

It is easy to show that a countable intersection of cones is itself a cone; the Martin measure is therefore a countably complete filter.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Martin measure” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Martin, measure and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 309-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Martin, measure and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q6776970. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Martin measure”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Martin measure primary sources, Martin measure archive and Martin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Martin measure”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Martin measure” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.