CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791)

extinct baronetcy

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ138002153 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Martin baronetcy, of Lockynge in the County of Berkshire, was created in the Baronetage of Great Britain on 28 July 1791 for Henry Martin, Member of Parliament for Southampton. The title became extinct on the death of the 5th Baronet in 1910, leaving no heir.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791)” as extinct baronetcy. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1791, 1910—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Martin, baronets and Lockynge can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as extinct baronetcy. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q138002153. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1791 and 1910.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791) primary sources, Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791) archive and Martin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Martin baronets of Lockynge (1791)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.