CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Martin Dew

English badminton player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ1903620
Source-derived summary

Martin Dew (born 16 August 1958) is a former English male badminton player who specialized in doubles.

Career

Dew won two medals in the World Championships, a silver medal in 1983 for men's doubles and a bronze medal in 1987 for mixed doubles. He shared the mixed doubles title at the All-England Championships twice with Gillian Gilks (1982 and 1984). Dew is also one of the most successful players ever in the European Badminton Championships with four titles, one of them in men's doubles and three in mixed doubles.

He is one of the very few elite players to have completed a Ph.D during his playing career. He gained a Ph.D in 1984 from Hatfield University in the subject of Numerical Optimisation in cooperation with Rolls Royce aeroengines.

Achievements

World Championships

Men's doubles

Mixed doubles

World Cup

Mixed doubles

Commonwealth Games

Men's doubles

Mixed doubles

European Championships

Men's doubles

Mixed doubles

IBF World Grand Prix (26 titles, 19 runners-up)

The World Badminton Grand Prix sanctioned by International Badminton Federation (IBF) from 1983 to 2006.

Men's doubles

Mixed doubles

International tournaments (7 titles, 6 runners-up)

Men's doubles

Mixed doubles

References

European results Archived 7 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine

English statistics

All England champions 1899-2007

Pat Davis: The Encyclopaedia of Badminton. Robert Hale, London, 1987, pp.

Editorial summary

“Martin Dew” enters the record as english badminton player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Martin, English and badminton can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1958, 1983, 1987, 1982—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Martin, English and badminton.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Martin Dew” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Martin, English and badminton provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1903620. The first chronological checks are 1958, 1983, 1987 and 1982.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Martin Dew”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Martin Dew primary sources, Martin Dew archive and Martin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Martin Dew”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Martin Dew” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.