Marko Topo
Serbian tennis player
Marko Topo (Serbian Cyrillic: Марко Топо; born 13 September 2003) is a German professional tennis player. He has a career-high ATP singles ranking of No. 235 achieved on 2 March 2026 and a best doubles ranking of No. 573, reached on 1 July 2024. Topo formerly represented Serbia.
Career
2021: ATP debut
In May 2021, Topo made his ATP main draw debut at the Belgrade Open after receiving a wildcard for the singles main draw.
In September, he obtained his first Challenger level win, in Banja Luka, thanks to a wildcard, defeating compatriot Danilo Petrović 4–6, 7–6, 6–2. In the next round he then defeated Vitaliy Sachko, winning 7-6 in the third set, thus reaching the quarterfinals and landing in the top 1000 for the first time.
2022: ATP 500 and Top 500 debuts
In April 2022, Topo got a qualification wildcard for the ATP tournament in 2022 BMW Open in Munich, where he defeated fourth seed Henri Laaksonen in straights sets and Norbert Gombos in three sets to qualify for his second ATP main draw, where he lost to the German Oscar Otte in the first round.
At the Hamburg Open, he qualified for his first ATP 500 tournament after also receiving a qualifying wildcard but lost in the first round to Alex Molčan.
The public source identifies “Marko Topo” as serbian tennis player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Marko, Topo and Serbian.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Marko Topo”, the useful work is to connect “serbian tennis player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q106949539. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003, 2026, 2024 and 2021.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Marko Topo”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Marko Topo primary sources, Marko Topo archive and Marko research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marko Topo”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Marko Topo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.