CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Marius Alfius

Campanian ally of Hannibal during the Second Punic War

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ11935407
Source-derived summary

Marius Alfius was a medix tuticus (leader), a position equivalent to supreme magistrate of the people of Campania. He was an ally of Hannibal during the Second Punic War, especially during the Battle of Cumae in 215 BC. He was defeated and killed by the Roman consul Tiberius Gracchus in this battle, when he launched an unexpected attack on an assembly in which over 2,000 Campanian warriors were killed, along with 34 military standards lost.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Marius Alfius” as campanian ally of Hannibal during the Second Punic War. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 75-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Marius, Alfius and Campanian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as campanian ally of Hannibal during the Second Punic War. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q11935407. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Marius Alfius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Marius Alfius primary sources, Marius Alfius archive and Marius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marius Alfius”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Marius Alfius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.