Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha
1965 film by Claude Chabrol
Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha (lit. 'Marie-Chantal versus Dr. Kha') is a 1965 spy film directed by Claude Chabrol. The film stars Marie Laforêt as Marie-Chantal, a young woman who gets caught up with a group of spies led by Dr. Kha who seek out a jewel called the Blue Panther. The jewel was passed on to her by the secret agent Bruno Kerrien. Unbeknownst to Marie-Chantal, it contains a terrible virus capable of wiping out humanity.
Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha was one of the many European co-productions from the 1960s that made spy films following the worldwide success of the James Bond film series that decade. Chabrol, who was one of the directors in the French New Wave, had made a turn to more commercially-oriented projects in the 1960s with films like Marie-Chantal and Le Tigre aime la chair fraiche (1964), Our Agent Tiger (1965).
Plot
While traveling to Switzerland with her cousin Hubert, the young woman Marie-Chantal meets Bruno Kerrien. Kerrien is a secret agent who entrusts her with the jewel called the Blue Panther.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha” is 1965 film by Claude Chabrol. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Marie-Chantal, contre and docteur, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “1965 film by Claude Chabrol” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q751550. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1965 and 1964.
Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha primary sources, Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha archive and Marie-Chantal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha”?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Marie-Chantal contre le docteur Kha” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.