Maria Van den Bergh
(1613-1671) Dutch noblewoman

Maria Elisabeth Van den Bergh, Princess of Hohenzollern-Hechingen (January 1613 – 29 November 1671) was a Dutch noblewoman and daughter of Hendrik van den Bergh. She lived at the court of Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia around the year 1628.
Early life
She was born on January 1613 in Stevensweert. She spent part of her youth in Brussels at the court of Isabella Clara Eugenia, the strict Catholic governor of the Southern Netherlands. However, his also came into Northern Dutch court circles. In The Hague she was friends with Amalia of Solms-Braunfels, the wife of Stadtholder Frederik Hendrik van Oranje-Nassau, who was a cousin of her father. Amalia had come to The Hague as lady-in-waiting to Winter Queen Elisabeth Stuart.
Marriage
Maria Elisabeth married Eitel Frederick II, Prince of Hohenzollern-Hechingen on March 19, 1630. The marriage was solemnized at Boutersem Castle near Leuven, which belonged to her mother's family. Her husband was born in Hechingen in January 1601 as the son of Johan Georg van Hohenzollern-Hechingen and Francisca van Salm-Finstingen.
The public source identifies “Maria Van den Bergh” as (1613-1671) Dutch noblewoman. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Maria, Bergh and 1613-1671.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Maria Van den Bergh”, the useful work is to connect “(1613-1671) Dutch noblewoman” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120031844. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1613, 1671, 1628 and 1630.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Maria Van den Bergh”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Maria Van den Bergh primary sources, Maria Van den Bergh archive and Maria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Maria Van den Bergh”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Maria Van den Bergh” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.